Register
Forgot Password?
Score
-
-
-
  /100
Certificate
SEO Certificate

Chapter 3: An offer they can't refuse (create mind-blowing landing pages for Search Engines and people)

Sorry, you are not logged in. Please login to get full access to this page or register if you're not registered yet.

Now,

  • All nasty mistakes are corrected
  • Frames and flash are done with.
  • Your site is submitted to search engines
  • Crawlers will have no problem looking at it

And we can get down to onpage optimization as it is. Exactly what you'll learn and do this time is:

Go ahead with the guide, and you'll see what stands behind these tricky titles. Warning: you've got a real lot to learn, but remember this is a practical guide, so guess what?.. You have even more to DO, getting ready for the big success day. And this time, the talk is again about onpage optimization, which is (let's recall once again) twisting and changing pages on your website, as opposed to offpage optimization, which is, playing with SEO–related things that exist outside your web pages.

Here's one more example. Last time me and my wife came back after a holiday trip, we looked at our house and realized at once: our elder boy has had a rocking party. These teenagers nearly ruined the house!.. But that's not the point.

Here's the thing: preparing for the party, Mike got lots of music CDs, plenty of beer and he even decorated the house. ( I never thought my son had a sense of beauty :) That was all like on–page optimization.

And, together with his 2 friends they decided whom to invite and gave out dozens of invitation cards. This looks pretty much like off–page optimization.

Both onpage and offpage optimization are done to get a better position in Search Engines, that is, to drive more visitors to your site. Or, in terms of our material world, what you're going to do now will definitely drive more money to your bank account. So why wait? Let's go.

3.1 Imagine you're on a plane, or What's a landing page?

Think of the word: landing.

I guess one of the first things to associate is landing field. And indeed, it has pretty much in common with a landing page.

OK, now let's imagine you're on a plane, and it's about to land. Here's the picture: the Boeing's wheels meet the runway, and in a couple of moments, it taxies to the landing field. You see a tube attached, and in just a couple of moments, you rush to the airport building together with a flow of people. Now think: where do they all go to? Either to register and take a taxi to a hotel, or to wait at the terminal, filling the time getting souvenirs and duty–free spirits. And here's the essence: of these crowds of people that arrive, no one stays at the landing field for long, and nobody leaves it by the same path they came. The stream of people moves where it should move, and that's pretty much the same direction for all. Putting it in SEO terms, all visitors proceed further.

So if your web page were a landing field, nobody'd be able to hit the Back button in the browser. And, because you can't say "Don't hit the back button!", your goal is to set your visitor in a mood to do what you expect (e.g. buy, or click a link, or leave a comment and so on), and not click the backward arrow.

A landing page can look like a plain–text article, or like a bunch of short couple–of–words product descriptions, a directory of articles, a form to enter visitor's name and email, or else.

Look here for examples. That's the URL of a nice landing page that invites you to choose kids' clothes:
http://www.thekidswindow.co.uk/

or here's a landing page that directs its visitors to enter their names and contact information:
http://nymag.com/newsletters/

Whatever it looks like, a landing page's made for two main purposes:

  1. Attracting visitors
  2. Making visitors proceed further

These two things can be the steps to your first million, so remember them! And — let's come up to the table.

12 comments

Add comment Hide commentsShow comments

Please log in or register to leave a comment.

2008-08-21 16:21:12: Wade Weston

I am sorry maybe I am not the right target but I thought both sites above did a poor job at accomplishing either goal you mentioned.

The kid's clothing site made me want to hit the back button immediately as there is just so much stuff right in your face all at one and nothing stood out like a headline to tell me why I should stay or even why I was there.

The newsletter site made me scroll all the way down to find the opt in form before the site gave me any confirmation why I went to the site to begin with.

Anyway, just my two cents and I am not a designer so I could be way off base.

Answer
2008-08-22 03:25:41: Dan Richmond

Hi Wade. I will agree about the kids' clothes site - good that you have a better understanding than those guys. But I don't think we should blame the newsletter site. They just let you make a choice before you subscribe ;)

Answer
2008-09-02 11:56:47: abe deu

i agree both are poor

Answer
2009-08-05 10:59:24: Jacob Forrest

I agree... those sites both are an absolute "BACK" for me. Couldn't close the window fast enough.
If I were actually interested in the products at the store it would be slightly different. For example, when I go here: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/ I occasionally actually use these shortcuts. I'd say this page is at least styled better, even though there's gobs of info.

Answer
2009-09-15 10:28:38: Oscar Del Santo

Now with Google Website Optimizer and A/B testing one can check which landing page version/format words better and choose accordingly

Answer
2009-09-17 05:19:59: Dan Richmond

Oscar Del Santo

I used this tool earlier but it has nothing to do with SEO - you only track the page's ability to convert. It is good enough to test your page copy (although Google's results here are not too reliable - you will notice that if you also have your own system for statistics).

WebSite Auditor will rather check your pages from the SEO point of view - to increase their ability to rank high in search engines.

Answer
2009-10-14 03:18:07: Dirk Weemaes

Hi Dan,
I actually am quite happy with the contents of my website. It is to the point and focused on lay out rather than attracting guests to the hotel.
Would it be wrong to make landing pages as per your instructions, just for the purpose of ranking high in Google f.e., without the landing pages being part of the website for someone typing in the homepage URL directly. There would in other words be no links on my website to these landing pages so that people would never be able to serve to them from my website; The landing pages would only be reachable via a search. The philosophy behind this that I want to keep the look and esthetics of my website the way it is now.
Regards,
dirk

Answer
2009-10-16 09:01:05: Dan Richmond

@Dirk Weemaes

I keep saying here that the content of your webpages should be good from the user's point of view in the first turn. Value comes first, SEO second. And in fact it's absolutely impossible to make webpages reachable only via search engines. I guess you're misinterpreting the whole thing here...

Answer
2009-12-08 19:52:53: Ken Taylor

Didn't really appreciate this until I read the following comment from @Dan (just above this comment)

"I keep saying here that the content of your webpages should be good from the user's point of view in the first turn. Value comes first, SEO second..."


I'm doing Adsense using micro-niche sites. So in a sense, each one of my five pages is a landing page--It sole purpose is to create value for that KW that the page is optimized for.

Side note: Just for fun I ran the Kids clothing link through the previous lesson's Validator. The results:
23 errors
10 warnings

I too was turned off by the site, but I clicked away with a lesson learned on the importance of how "value" and "people-eye-friendly-usable" a landing page/home page/any page should be.

Answer
2010-01-01 12:06:40: Paul Watchorn

I had a look at the Childrens clothing page, I thought I would have a look at the source code, can't get it to come up on the home page, just a copyright notice interesting, I have never seen that before, I did not think it was possible.
The second page 'appeared' not to have any keywords in the tags either.
All interesting stuff, it all makes for interesting research!

Answer
2010-02-09 18:51:22: Tim Inglis

@ Paul Watchthorn

They not only have one of the more poorly constructed sites I've seen in a long time (tables for layout... GET OUT OF THE 90's!!!), but they have used JavaScript to disable the right click, which is why you couldn't view the source.

If you're using Firefox, go to "View >> View Source". In Internet Exploder 8, "Page >> View Source" and you will be able to view the source code.

Hope this helps.

Tim.

Answer
2010-03-16 18:31:22: John Fenton

On thekidswindow site... I have a few SEO related questions.

The top of the page seems good, but once you roll down a bit you are confronted with a wall of text. Was that wall of text really needed to get the rankings? (that part of the page obviously could have been redesigned to make it more aesthetic.)

From a use ability standpoint... I would have made most of the bullet points near the top of the site hyper links. Would the extra links have hurt the page any from an SEO standpoint.

On the See out TV Ad item. Would it really hurt to make both the image and the text link able?

Answer